Such a balanced explosion of flavor, yet so simple to make. A new favorite!

Spectacular !! I just prepared one of these for the first time in several years ...... Spectacular !!

FYI, also discussed here: https://www.cocktaildetour.com/la-lumiere

Question: Shake with or without ice? If without ice, why not simply stir? Discard the lemon zest? Maybe drop it into the libation if so inclined, perhaps for a tad more flavor, but some color, for sure.

Regardless, the Panic Button is a great drink. Somewhat bitter, but also tangy. For the bourbon, I used Bulleit Bourbon. It's strong flavors enable it to butt heads with the Campari. The cherry flavor, however, suffers somewhat because of the choice of Bourbon and the Camari. I rated this libation at 4.0. Some might say 4.5. In any event, it's a drink to enjoy.

Shake with ice. I'd have thought this was implied by common style (in contrast to "dry shake"), but have edited the recipe for clarity.

Feel free to do what you want with the zest, but Dewberry Hotel doesn't use them as a garnish (and the recipe in Imbibe didn't even have the detail to express, though their YouTube video did).

On my second effort, I used Maker's Mark for the Bourbon, and a skinny "fat" 1/2 oz Cherry Herring, and a skinny 1/4 oz lemon juice. Overall, the drink had a more balanced flavor. In short, I recommend using Maker's Mark or Buffalo Trace for the Bourbon, and a tad more than 1/2 oz for the Cherry Herring. I, personally, prefer slightly less than the called-for 1/4 oz lemon--but that's a matter of personal taste. I still rate Panic Button 4.0, even with the above mentioned changes. With a flip of the coin, however, I might go to 4.5.

From the video, it seems that the Dewberry Hotel uses Four Roses (standard yellow label). When I tried it, I used Old Gran Dad 114.

Also sort of a Last Word variation.

Far closer to the Corpse Reviver #2 with Elderflower subbed for orange liqueur.

Crazy good! Balanced, full body, cinnamon on the back end.

.

When I had this a year before in 2016 at Tales, Jackson Cannon said that he created it at the Hawthorne in Boston:
https://cocktailvirgin.blogspot.com/2016/08/little-grey-lady.html

A nice after dinner drink, but it'll do before dinner also. The Benedictine comes through enough to drown out the Nocino's flavor, however. I used 2 dashes of the Mole; a nice outcome. I strongly recommend this libation, and rate it 4.0. An orange twist might be worth trying.

There's not enough there there.

Surprisingly good, I would have rated it a 4 by myself, but family members were more effusive in their praise, so I'll give it a 5. Very dark appearance, strong baking spice flavors, The essence is kola meets baking spice, meets orange. Intense and palatable flavor with a dark hue, not base-spirit-forward, allowing the Averna to shine.

Original reference is dead. Internet archive gives the same ratios, though I wonder if that is because they want to sell more dry curacao?  Internet recipes vary wildly, but that's the most curacao in any of them & makes for a big drink. Since this was attributed to Regan, I looked in his book.  He calls for only 1/2 oz of curacao. He was not the originator of the drink, though, writing "I enjoy the combination of brandy and port, so this recipe from the 1950s caught my eye. It's a little too sweet without the bitters-I recommend at least three dashes. Orange bitters can also be successfully used in the drink." (no idea if that last remark was just to sell more bitters (ha!)).

Curated this - removed dead link, reduced curacao to 1/2 oz down from 1 1/2 which is extreme. Anyone have a copy of the book who could look up the original? Thanks,  Zachary

It's .5 oz curacao in the book, and the recommended amount of bitter dashes is "at least three."

I imagine the request might have been for Crosby Gaige's Cocktail Guide and Ladies' Companion (1941), which seems to be the first published version

Correct - sorry for the ambiguity. EUVS doesn't have it surprisingly. Thanks,  Zachary

My bad, I didn't read the earlier posts closely enough.

Interestingly the MixologyTech "Cocktails from the Golden Age" app has a "Betty Ross" cocktail from Sloppy Joe's Cocktail Manual (1932), with a build of 1 oz cognac, 1 oz port (ruby or tawny), 2-3 drops of curacao & 2-3 drops of Angostura bitters, which would seem to predate the Gaige's.  Not sure how much you'd notice 2-3 drops of curacao in a drink, but this would certainly appear to be drier than using equal parts curacao, even with the reduction in bitters.

Well well... excuse me while I break into some Peg + Cat (you've gotta have a 3 year old to get this): "Problem solved, the problem is solved, we solved the problem, everything is awesome, problem solved!". So... EUVS has the 1932 Sloppy Joe's cocktail book and it's got the "Betty (sic) Ross" cocktail which is indeed cognac, port, and drops of curacao and Angostura. My guess is that liqueurs were much sweeter (closer to max soluble sugar) and more intense than they are today, so drops of curacao would work. I will update the link and the recipe. Thanks,  Zachary

While I'm familiar with some of the historical cocktail literature, I'm far from an expert, but I do wonder if the "drops" used in the Sloppy Joe's Cocktail Manual are more analogous to a current (or even historical) "dash" or "dashes" and not what we currently consider drops (typically using an eye dropper).  Pretty much every recipe in that book you linked uses "drops" measurements for everything from Ango to grenadine to creme de menthe, with no dashes, which you simply don't see from cocktail books from the same era.  For instance, look at the recipe for the Mary Pickford.  Sloppy Joe's has drops of grenadine & maraschino, while others from a similar time frame typically use 2-3 dashes (Libro de Cocktail, 1929) or bar spoons (Manual del Cantinero, 1924) for those same ingredients.

You could very well be right about that but why not just say dash if they meant dash? Thanks,  Zachary

Might be because of the Cuban origin of the book? The Spanish word is "gota" & different bilingual books seem to use either "drops" or "dash" as the English for the same.